“That’s not Christian” is a phrase that one hears quite often, usually when some Christian preacher has made a point of their beliefs that does not conform to the politically correct liberal worldview. The listener will cry out “that’s not very Christian!”. The implication is that Jesus was a cheery left wing figure, whose teaching are wholly pacifistic and all inclusive, accepting all behaviours and peoples.
It is not as if these people actually believe in Jesus. Often they will be atheists, simply looking to dismiss someone’s beliefs by claiming those beliefs are in opposition to Christian scripture. They only accept Christianity when it matches their own ideology, so if a professing Christian claims to believe something against this, they will be dismissed as a hypocrite, or someone in opposition to Jesus.
This fallacy will usually be borne out of some half remembered lessons that Jesus taught forgiveness, or out of the heavy promotion of modern churches that focus on bringing in followers by any means necessary, and so in order to be less discriminating, giving them as wide a potential base of followers as possible, they preach a doctrine of universal acceptance.
It is also common to see the more obviously exclusionist Old Testament rejected as supposedly out of date, or dismissed as “Jewish” scripture. Nonetheless, it is possible to identify the real thread of Christian doctrine with only the New Testament, especially in showing what Jesus’ real teachings were.
In Romans 1:27, Paul gives Christianity’s position on homosexuality:
“And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.”
And at verse 32 explains the penalty:
“Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death”
Now this doesn’t seem much in line with the vision of Christian tolerance that many people have in their heads, does it?
In Luke 22:36, Jesus instructs his followers:
“he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.”
Now this could be taken literally to require his followers to defend their religion with military force, or it could be taken to be a demonstration of the inevitability of antichrist attack on Christians. Either way, it doesn’t paint much of a picture of tolerance or pacifism in the face of alien creeds.
In John 8:44, Jesus tells his Jewish detractors what he thinks of them:
“Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
It doesn’t show much religious or racial tolerance from a person who calls them the spawn of Satan.
In 1 Timothy 2:12, we are told “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”
Nor is it very modern of these early Christians to reject gender equality and enforce traditional gender roles.
All these things, said by the most important figures in early Christianity, are purportedly not very Christian. Perhaps it is merely that many of the modern churches are in opposition to Christ. When they spout fashionable dogma that goes against what the bible teaches, perhaps it is time for us to point out that what they say is, when compared with what the bible actually says, not very Christian.