Saturday, 26 March 2011

Family and Christianity


We owe a duty not merely to our God, but also to our friends and family, to educate them and help them to grasp the truth of the Bible’s message. 

The maintenance of our families in a godly manner is one of our most important duties. For if we do  not encourage our children to learn the truth, they will wander into waywardness, into immorality and degeneracy. While a damascene conversion can still happen at that late stage, the risks are still inherently dangerous, and as such it is much simpler for everyone if we simply raise them in the truth of Christianity from a young age.
If we want our friends and family to live happily in the resurrection, this is what we must do. It has consequences for this world as well, for if they are living in the service of God, they will be less influenced by antichrist purveyors of unwholesome anti-moralism, and stand a better chance of surviving in the dark days that lie ahead of us. 

Many otherwise good people out there are living their lives in service to evil, because they do not know the history of modern popular culture, and persist unthinkingly in consuming it. This can be shown in 2 Timothy 3:6, “For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts”. Our families will be led astray through ignorance, and they may not even recognise it as evil, it being disguised as “freedom”, “progressiveness”, “inclusivity” and other such concepts that appeal to intelligent people who have not seen the damage that these things can cause.

But we are shown the way to avoid this destruction of our own families in this same chapter. 2 Timothy 3:15 states: “And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” 

If we bring up our families in the faith, we can arm them against their self destruction, and shield them from being led astray by the sins of others.  It is said at John 8:32:“and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”. We cannot help to free anyone of these people from their own self destructive paths unless we are willing to take a stand and preach the truth of God’s laws to them. 

If we do not, there may not be as many people left in the end, for we did not make the effort to show them the path to salvation while we still had the chance.

Saturday, 19 March 2011

Pre-Catholic Christianity

We can see from history that the pre-eminence of establishment churches is only really a recent development, and prior to the last thousand years, there was much more variety in the types of Christianity than existed between 1000AD and 1900AD.

In Scotland, for example, a 6th century monastic system was established at Iona, wholly independent of the papal authority for much of its existence. It had been formed by some of the earliest missionaries from Ireland, the followers of Saint Patrick, who converted large numbers of Irish tribes while the papal religion was still struggling to gain support amongst the more urbanised peoples of southern Europe. 

Once druidism ended in Ireland, Christianity took hold and was even invited by many of the local rulers. This led to a strong monastic system developing, with the gospel being preached and new priests being ordained even as the remains of the old Roman Empire slowly died. 

This branch of Christianity eventually emigrated to Scotland, where the Iona Abbey was built. Eventually,  other Abbeys were even constructed in France and western Europe, once Viking raids became too destructive for many of the monks. 

This independent Church even called the Viking invaders “gentiles” which though inaccurate, demonstrates their belief in the cause of Israelite separatism. It has long been the belief of many in Ireland that they are descendants of the tribe of Dan. However, this freedom did not last forever. The Papal church in Rome had regained much of the old Roman power, but now increased its influence under the threat of damnation, it bastardised the biblical doctrines into a form that tricked the peoples of Europe into following its authority.

This influence reached the Celtic churches, and after much deliberation, it was sadly decided that they would join with the Catholic Church and make themselves subservient to Rome. 

But the subconscious need for independence had taken root, and the Church of England and Church of Scotland freed themselves from Papal tyranny in 1534 and in 1560. While these churches were still very distant from the truth, they gave rise to Puritanism and similar creeds, which in a long history that carried over into North America, eventually gave rise to the true form of Christianity espoused in the New Testament by Jesus and his followers. Despite the long interlude of universalist false Christianity, those early Christians would be vindicated in the modern day, when the establishment churches no longer hold total control over our faith. 

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

Biblical Immigration Laws

Many passages in the bible explain the need to isolate the Israelites from harmful influences. They explain the need to separate the Israelites from the lesser peoples, warning them against taking foreign wives, who would lead their sons astray, and cause them to worship false gods.
Deuteronomy 23:2 states that a bastard shall not enter the kingdom of the lord, bastard here meaning that which is mixed, impure. Deut 23:3 states that an Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter the kingdom of God (these were Arab tribes).

We are then told the reason for this in the next two verses: 

“Because they met you not with bread and with water in the way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse thee.
Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.”

These people turned their backs on the people of Israel in their time of need, and as such it is not the duty of Christians to improve the lives of these people, nor is it their duty to bring them into the faith, indeed, it is their duty to exclude them from it, lest even greater harm result.
These laws still remain in place today, but they have been ignored by universalist humanism which has been granted a sham legitimacy by interfaith movements, who invite unwholesome influences into purportedly Christian churches, in the naive belief that this will foster tolerance, as though tolerance of evil has ever been a biblical direction. 

These alien influences will only ever diminish the holiness of Christian faith, and as such must not be permitted to operate where Christians might be tempted into following those strange creeds. As we are told at Matthew 7:6, if we cast our pearls before swine, they will merely trample them underfoot, and even attack us. 
So the establishment priests and pastors that encourage this mixing with degenerates on the basis of Jesus’ exhortations to go out and preach should remember that those to whom the preaching should be done is not universal. The laws governing Israelite purity are still very much part of true Christianity, and should be followed and enforced in our Christian nations accordingly.

Saturday, 5 March 2011

The Right Wing God


If we look at the passages of the bible in context, and taken as a whole, not merely picking out passages at will, we can see a certain ideology emerging, as detailed and fleshed out as any party political manifesto. If we look at the bible without the prejudices of interpretation by clergy with vested interests, we can see that the rules handed down to us by God are inherently right wing. He even states that those to his right are his servants and those to his left oppose him.

The bible is full of these instances. From the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah for sexual licentiousness, to the laws under Leviticus 20:13 calling for homosexuals to be put to death, to the rather intolerant execution of hundreds of idol worshipers in Exodus 32, it can hardly be suggested that Christianity is the religion of peace and tolerance without rejecting most of the word of God. 

Why, then, do so many Christians follow Anglicanism, which dumbs itself down to allow anyone of a reprobate mind to join, even permitting women to serve as bishops, even allowing homosexual unions to be held within its walls in some gross parody of a Christian marriage? 

Or so many more follow Catholicism, which conducts its affairs with all the sanctity and humility of a seaside tourist shop, while covering up the abhorrent excesses of its clergy? 

These established churches no more care for Christ than any Hindu does. Instead, organised religion uses lies and superstitious ceremonies to gain the support of the masses, and with that support comes money. But the money stops if people don’t like what they say, so what results is a permissive and sugar-coated perversion in the place of Christianity, where everything is permitted and nothing is sacred, except the wealth and privilege of the clergy.  

At every point in the bible, the word of God maintains a theological ideology that in our mundane politics would be termed “ultraconservative” at best, and downright fascistic at worst. It is only natural that when our civilisation followed the law of the bible, we were strong, but now we think we can do better than God, we have left our nations to ruin amongst the failed social schemes of pluralist left wing politics. 

We are told “ye have the poor always with you” (Matthew 26:11). Is this not a rejection of communist ideology, whereby our religion is forbidden while our energies are diverted to some imaginary crusade against poverty (which, as those living in Eastern Europe could attest, only exacerbates poverty)? 

Creating a liberal interpretation of Christianity is only possible by ignoring the intent of God when he inspired the writing of the bible. It might create a nice cheerful version of religion that wins them many converts, but it would not be true Christianity, and when the time of judgment arrives, these people would not be accepted, and their deeds would be denounced. 

Those who recognise the decadent immorality of the established sects should not let themselves be put off from Christianity by such terrible representatives. If one follows the laws as they are set out in the Bible, and adheres to the original rules laid out there, one would be a truer Christian than any pope or archbishop, and God would undoubtedly recognise this. 

We are told in 2 Corinthians 6:16 that the temple of God is within his people. Therefore, if we are found to be participating in religious services that transgress the laws prohibiting idolatry and usury, we have a duty to leave those places filled with those reprobate people, and encourage others to leave as well. 

Anybody who dislikes Christianity for its promotion of degenerate lifestyles, greed, and oppression of good men through complicity in evil leftist governments should be aware that this is merely a debasement of true Christianity, which is no Christianity at all. Your goals would be better served by following the laws of God as lain before you in the bible, and you would feel more a part of them than any eastern mysticism or pagan rituals that might otherwise appear to be an alternative to the established churches.